Carlos Taberner vs Shintaro Mochizuki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Apr at 11:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Taberner vs S. Mochizuki

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Taberner 1 - 0 Mochizuki
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carlos Taberner winning 2 and Shintaro Mochizuki winning 0. The last match between Carlos Taberner and Shintaro Mochizuki was at the Oeiras 4 Challenger, 17-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Taberner getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Taberner | 1 |
Mochizuki | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) Oeiras 4 Challenger(04-17-25)
C. Taberner vs S. Mochizuki H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$622,285 | Career Prize Money | $963,765 |
61.79% (477-295) | Career Total W/L | 54.50% (212-177) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
12 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
62.50% (5-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 28.57% (2-5) |
C. Taberner vs S. Mochizuki Match Preview:
In the realm of tennis analytics, examining recent statistics can provide a clearer picture for comparing players and making match predictions. Over the last six months, Taberner has demonstrated slightly superior performance on second serve points, winning 46.94% compared to Mochizuki's 42.93%. In the context of return games, Mochizuki appears stronger against second serves, having won 47.61% of his opponent's points, while Taberner trails with 45.86%. The first serve return statistics are closer, with Taberner securing 29.92% against Mochizuki's 28.55%.
Examining pressure situations, Taberner has saved 52.19% of breakpoints faced in recent games, marginally outperforming Mochizuki's rate of 51.24%. Furthermore, when it comes to converting break points, Mochizuki has an edge with a 36.41% conversion rate, compared to Taberner's 30.96%. Considering overall match performance in the past year, Taberner holds a win percentage of 60.49% (W/L 49/32), eclipsing Mochizuki's 54.17% (W/L 39/33).
Regarding their preferred surfaces, both players share a proclivity for clay, with Taberner achieving a 64% win rate and Mochizuki following closely with 61%. Conversely, both have faced challenges on grass, where Taberner's win rate falls to 25%, and Mochizuki achieves a 41% win rate. Assessing their level of play, Taberner and Mochizuki predominantly compete in Challenger/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, with Taberner winning 60.76% and Mochizuki 58% of these matches.
The level of competition faced can influence these figures, with Taberner's opponents having an average rank of 243.44 over the last year, compared to Mochizuki's 262.82. In matches extending to a deciding set, Mochizuki narrowly leads with a win rate of 59% to Taberner's 58%. These statistics, alongside current event performance, offer insight into their potential outcomes.
Judging by the stats, while Taberner seems to have an edge on the clay surface and slightly more experience with higher-ranked players, Mochizuki has shown prowess in return games and break point conversions. Given the comprehensive analysis, Mochizuki's ability to capitalize on break point opportunities may be decisive, slightly favoring him to win the upcoming match. However, the result could be tilted by Taberner's consistency on favored surfaces and his ability to maintain composure under pressure.
Carlos Taberner vs Shintaro Mochizuki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Taberner vs S. Mochizuki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:6:25 | Average Match Time | 2:6:25 |
75% (47/63) | 1st Serve % | 50% (37/74) |
55% (26/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (25/37) |
69% (11/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (10/37) |
60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
53% (39/74) | Return Points Win % | 41% (26/63) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Taberner Recent Matches Played
S. Mochizuki Recent Matches Played

C. Taberner vs S. Mochizuki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.79% (477/295) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.50% (212/177) |
59.92% (1063/711) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.60% (486/438) |
54.17% (8832/7473) | Games Win/Loss | 50.22% (4385/4346) |
49.15% (29/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (120/100) |
64.46% (428/236) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.55% (61/45) |
43.18% (19/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.63% (13/19) |
20.00% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.06% (18/13) |
0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
1270 | Aces Total | 844 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
1955 | Total Double Faults | 1622 |
1:32:50 | Average Match Time | 1:42:5 |
448.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.62 |
62% (27875/44717) | 1st Serve % | 56% (15531/27525) |
66% (18504/27875) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (10216/15531) |
50% (8358/16842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5616/11994) |
46% (2373/5155) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1376/3097) |
43% (19307/45048) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11806/27780) |
43.33% (13/17) | Slam W/L | 60.61% (20/13) |
50.00% (6/6) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (9/12) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
51.43% (36/34) | Main Tour W/L | 35.29% (12/22) |
59.81% (247/166) | Challenger W/L | 56.52% (117/90) |
70.85% (175/72) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (54/36) |
63% (472/753) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (201/370) |
0% (0/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
53% (105/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (66/114) |
54% (122/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (78/139) |
87% (493/429) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (202/168) |
13% (493/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (202/33) |
18% (278/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (187/42) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
